A recent national poll by Global Info analytics has revealed that a staggering 77% of Ghanaians believe the Appointments Committee is more focused on scoring political points than assessing the competence and suitability of nominees.
This perception has sparked a significant debate about the integrity of parliamentary oversight and its implications for effective governance. The survey, which was conducted between January 30th and February 1st, 2025, shows that while 63% of respondents are satisfied with the committee’s work, only 28% are “very satisfied” or “extremely satisfied”. A significant 37% remain dissatisfied with the committee’s performance.
The committee’s leadership has drawn contrasting public reactions, with Chairman Hon. Bernard Ahiafor maintaining modest support with 56% approval, while the opposition’s ranking member and Minority Leader, Hon. Alexander Afenyo-Markin, faces stronger criticism, with 64% disapproving of his performance.
Recent controversies surrounding the Appointments Committee have fueled public distrust in the vetting process, with disagreements between the Minority and Majority Caucuses leading to physical altercations and the destruction of public property.
Despite this, the public’s engagement with the vetting process remains high, with 88% of respondents actively following the committee’s work. The survey results come as President Mahama’s appointments have generally received strong public backing, with 90% of voters expressing satisfaction with his selections.
This contrast between approval of the appointees and criticism of the vetting process highlights public frustration with political theatrics in parliament. The poll also revealed strong public support (79%) for the Speaker’s recent decision to suspend four members of parliament
